According to some new research, Einstein’s theory of General Relativity might be wrong, or at least incomplete. Rachel Bean, a respected cosmologist at Cornell University, found that “between 8 and 11 billion years ago gravity’s distortion of time appeared to be three times as strong as its ability to curve space,” says New Scientist.
Of course, there’s a good chance that there’s something wrong with the data, but as Sean Carroll says on his blog, “Either the result is wrong, and we should be working hard to find out why, or it’s right, and we’re on the cusp of a revolution.”
[Read -> New Scientist Article]
[Read -> Sean Carroll's Cosmic Variance post]
My question is, “Are today’s scientists, who have believed for the last 300 years that mass mediates the gravitational force, any different from from the Scholastics believed in the Ptolemaic geocentric theory for a 1000 years? I believe they are the same because if people act on an erroneous belief for years they will hardly think about the validity of that belief. You could not tell the Scholastics that there was something wrong with their premises and you cannot tell today’s scientists that there is something wrong with this notion that mass has some mysterious power to either attract mass or warp space. They will not know what you are talking about. They will just think about something tangential to your questioning of the soundness of the premise that mass is the mediator of the gravitational force.
The mass-luminosity relation tells us that there is a high correlation among main sequence stars between a star’s mass and its luminosity. For five experiments demonstrating that the transfer of heat from a source of luminosity is gravitationally attractive and a gravitational theory based on the attractive effects of heat transfer go to http://vixra.org/abs/0907.0018 .
Please read my balloon inside balloon theory and theory of gravitoethertons in DOC.6198
Einstein’s theory of General Relativity might be wrong. : Eddington’s evidence in 1919 should be rejected, because it is not scientific. There is no scientific methods that can be justified to calculate arc between actual position and observed position of stars by comparing photographs of these stars, even more photos were made from different positions – Oxford and Roca Sundy / different latitude and longitude – and were made in different time.
See more : yalagada.com
Through discovering the relation between matter and space-time, I have
demonstrated that there is only one theory of relativity which explains geometry of space-time, motion and fundamental interaction as the result of vortex field. Therefore, one can conclude that dividing the theory of relativity into special and general theories is the result of poor understanding of Lorentz transformation and covariant electrdynamics.
Importantly, it is seen that the mechanisms behind gravitational and electrodynamic interactions are the same. This is nothing but the unification of fundamental forces based on the vortex theory of interaction. This is consistent with the fact that there is a symmetry in nature.
Therefore, the theory of general relativity cannot be a correct theory of gravity. General relativity actually creates new inconsistent problems instead of solving the problem of gravity. It is well known that when a theory is inconsistent, it creates new paradoxes.
See more: http://sites.google.com/site/ahadjesfandiari/