Brain development and snake oil: graphical presentations of science

Brain development and snake oil: graphical presentations of science

In a number of previous posts, I’ve discussed the way science can sometimes be wonderfully communicated through comics. (See here, here and here.) And it seems it used to be much more common than it is today — the Frontiers of Science appeared in newspapers all over the world every day for over 20 years.

But there appears to be a renewed interest in comic and graphical presentations of science.

Information is beautiful collates some truly brilliant ways of presenting data. This visualisation of the evidence supporting the use of various dietary supplements is much more helpful than a boring table of data.

This week’s edition of Science presents the winners and honorable mentions in the seventh annual International Science & Engineering Visualization Challenge. You can see a slide show of them here.

Interestingly, the winning entry is a comic. It was created by Dwayne Godwin, a professor of neurobiology at Wake Forest University School of Medicine. It explains how brains develop, from their first moments in a fetus to their development throughout adulthood. (To see a larger version, click on the image below.)

click to enlarge

(via Neurophilosophy)

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Pot causes psychosis? Not so fast…

Pot causes psychosis? Not so fast…

Teen Pot Use Linked To Psychoses“, “Teen pot smokers at high risk of mental illness“,”Study finds cannabis use is ‘crazy-making’” are the headlines being produced about some new research that finds a link between cannabis use and psychosis

But are the headlines justified? Well, headlines like this are rarely justified. A more interesting question worth asking is, does pot cause psychosis? And does this current study point to a causal link?

Two things are worth considering. Firstly, the researchers are careful to point out that the relationship between pot smoking and psychosis is complicated, meaning that inferring a causal connection is difficult. Secondly, some research done in the UK last year puts the case for a causal connection on very shaky ground.

The author’s caveats
The authors state in their conclusion that their study does suggest that smoking pot early is associated with higher rates of psychosis.

This study provides further support for the hypothesis that early cannabis use is a risk-modifying factor for psychosis-related outcomes in young adults.

Whether there is a causal link, however, is not entirely clear. As the authors emphasise, the connection between smoking pot and psychosis is very complicated since it is clear “since those with early-onset psychotic symptoms were also likely to report early cannabis use”.

The nature of the relationship between psychosis and cannabis use is by no means simple… Those individuals who were vulnerable to psychosis (ie, those who had isolated psychotic symptoms) were more likely to commence cannabis use, which could then subsequently contribute to an increased risk of conversion to a nonaffective psychotic disorder.

So it seems clear that people who are likely to develop psychosis are also more likely to smoke pot. Moreover, they authors continue:

Analyses that incorporated adjustments for depressive and anxiety-related disorders led to a reduction in the strength of the association between cannabis use and psychosis-related outcomes. This suggests that depression and/or anxiety disorders may mediate or moderate the pathways between cannabis use and psychosis-related outcomes. We plan to further explore these issues in more detail in future studies.

A previous study: pot doesn’t cause psychosis
In the face of some research published last year, I think the case for a causal link between smoking pot and developing psychotic symptoms requires some very strong evidence.

This study examined the medical records of 600,000 patients aged between 16 and 44, and failed to find any link between smoking pot and schizophrenia.

If smoking pot causes psychotic symptoms, massive increases in pot smoking within a population should correspond to an increase in psychosis.

A previous study found that pot smoking increased four-fold in the UK between 1972 and 2002 and 18 fold among under 18s. Now, if smoking pot causes psychosis, then we should expect to see an associated increase in the rates of psychosis.

But rather than finding an increase in psychotic symptoms, the authors found that the incidence was stable or declining.

In conclusion, this study did not find any evidence of increasing schizophrenia or psychoses in the general population from 1996 to 2005.

And since schizophrenia and psychosis did not increase, the authors conclude that “the causal models linking cannabis with schizophrenia/psychoses” are not supported by their study.

Given the limitations of studies that attempt to show a causal link and the strong evidence provided by the UK study, it doesn’t seem that claims of a causal link are justified.

ResearchBlogging.org

Frisher, M., Crome, I., Martino, O., & Croft, P. (2009). Assessing the impact of cannabis use on trends in diagnosed schizophrenia in the United Kingdom from 1996 to 2005 Schizophrenia Research, 113 (2-3), 123-128 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.05.031

McGrath, J., Welham, J., Scott, J., Varghese, D., Degenhardt, L., Hayatbakhsh, M., Alati, R., Williams, G., Bor, W., & Najman, J. (2010). Association Between Cannabis Use and Psychosis-Related Outcomes Using Sibling Pair Analysis in a Cohort of Young Adults Archives of General Psychiatry DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.6

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Bogus science busting at New Matilda

Bogus science busting at New Matilda

Here’s a great piece of bogus-science-busting from Anna Greer at New Matilda. I’m posting it here to make up somewhat for my month of absence…

Conservative media around the world flipped a collective bird at “smug” vegetarians last week, claiming that a report commissioned by the World Wildlife Fund had found that changes to land use meant that a vegetarian diet was more harmful to the environment than eating meat.

The London Times reported that “Becoming a vegetarian can do more harm to the environment than continuing to eat red meat, according to a study of the impacts of meat substitutes such as tofu”. The Daily Mail made even more sport out of the study’s findings, announcing that “Meat free diets can be bad for the planet”.

Unfortunately plenty of other mainstream media outlets, including the Australian, gleefully picked up this reading. In an I-told-you-so editorial, titled “Tuck in and save the planet”, the Australian again ridiculed the idea that eating a lot of meat was a problem: “Now a study for environmental lobbyists WWF, a body not usually noted for its conservative viewpoint, concedes our argument was correct. The study, by Cranfield University, found that turning vegetarian can do more environmental harm than eating red meat.”

In fact the study found nothing of the kind.

Read more »»

Thanks to @lauren_hp for the heads-up.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

February’s going to be a bit slow here at GBnB

This is just a quick note letting you guys know that the blog might be a bit slow for the next couple of weeks. I’ve got a lot on and might have trouble finding the time to blog. But stay tuned – I promise to be more productive in March!

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Bad Behavior has blocked 206 access attempts in the last 7 days.